The Best Suitable Newly Introduced Construction Management Technologies for Temporary Settlement Sites after Disasters from Sustainable Development Perspective

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Pardis, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Pardis, Iran

10.22111/jhe.2020.5649

Abstract

The provisioning of a minimum standard level of settlement and the designing of camps are among the primary and essential rights and requirements of those subjected to disasters or conflicts. The presence of shelters is essential to resist diseases and protect against natural and non-natural hazards. It is also important to maintain the dignity of humans in the family and social frameworks in tough situations. The present study involved the emergency tent of the UN high commissioner for refugees (UNHCR), Q-shelter, tarpaulin-concrete shelters, recycled-paper pipes, rock-block buildings, safe units, pre-construction wooden building system, lightweight steel frame (LSF) building system, insulating concrete formwork (ICF) building system, and sliding structure system. This study investigates the possibility of using new construction management methods and technologies in Iran to establish temporary settlement sites after disasters from different perspectives, such as consistency with environmental conditions, passive defense, cost, execution speed, ease of facilities, construction technologies, and execution quality via the hierarchical analysis approach. According to the final scores of new temporary settlement establishment methods, Q-shelters were found to be the most consistent method with environmental conditions. Also, the highest passive defense score was obtained for the LSF building system. Also, the final weights of the decision criteria indicated that the highest effect was derived for execution speed at a coefficient of 0.203. Finally, obtaining a score of 0.156, the LSF building system was found as the best building system in the mass housing project based on the six criteria, followed by the sliding structure building system in the second rank. Moreover, the smallest score was obtained for the rock block system.

Keywords


  1. Babaee, S., Sabour, MR., Kamalan, H. 2011, “Simulation of Natural Gas Saving through Foam Lightweight Concrete Utilization in Residential Buildings”, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 8(4): 337-346.
  2. Comerio, M C. 1998. Disaster Hits Homes: New Policy for Urban House Recovery, University of California Press, USA.
  3. Corsellis, T. and Vitale, A. 2015. Transitional Settlement: Displaced Populations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
  4. Davis, I. 1985. Shelter after Disaster. PHD dissertation, University College London, Development Institute, London.
  5. Fallahi, A. 2006. The Need to Plan a Comprehensive Plan for the Design of Camps and Emergency Accommodation in Unforeseen Events. Iran: Shahid Beheshti University.
  6. Fallahi, A., Kari Jafari, B. and Omidvar, B. 2006. “Temporary Settlement in Turkey,” Iran: University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan.
  7. 7.       Generalova, M., and Kuznetsova, A. 2016. “Modular Buildings in Modern Construction,” Journal of  Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering, 3: 167-172.
  8. Gohari, h. and Gholamali, H. 2013. “Passive Defense Planning and Locating Urban Shelters Using Fuzzy Logic, Case study of Kerman Urban Area one”, Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 2:7-13.
  9. Gholian, S., Borhani, B. and Jamei, A. 2014, “Evaluation of Various Building Systems for Temporary Settlement Sites After Disasters.” Journal of Crisis Management, 2:5-10.
  10. Hadad, S., and Rahmani, M.  2014. “Indigenous Housing in Rudbar, with Modeling of Modern anti-Earthquake Technology,” Iran: University of Yazd.
  11. Hasangholi Pour, S., Sharif Nejad, J. and Abdol Hoseini, J. 2015. “Minimum Standards and per Capita Accommodation Required for Survivors after Disaster,” Iran: Shahid Beheshti University of Hamedan.
  12. Kermani, A. and Kashizadeh, A. 2015. “Application of newly Introduced Paper Structures in creating Temporary Shelter in Crisis Management,”Journal of Architectural, Urban Planning and Urban Management Research, 2:1-10
  13. 13.    Koppel, T. 2017. “Evaluating the Risks in the Construction Wood Product System through a Criticality Assessment Framework,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 11: 387–395.
  14. Kozlovská, M., and Spisáková, M. 2015. “Modern Methods of Construction vs. Construction Waste,” Journal of Ecology and Environmental Protection, 3:483-490.
  15. Maham, A., Jafarizadeh, M. and Ghahramani, M. 2015. “Use of GIS Technology in Crisis Management after an Earthquake,” Journal of Comprehensive Crisis Management, 1:5-9.
  16. 16.    Mileti, D. 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United State. Washington D.C: University of Colorado of Boulder.
  17. 17.    Mostaghni, P. and Nourozi, A. 2014. “Post-Earthquake Housing Reconstruction Management Plan,” Journal of Structure, Architecture and Urban Development ,3: 1-14.
  18. Motlagh, MSP., Farsiabi, MM., and Kamalan HR. 2005. “An Interactive Environmental Economy Model for Energy Cycle in Iran,” Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 2: 41-56.
  19. Mozafari, Kh., Fallah, A., and Faezi, F. 2014. “Investigating the effect of using Prefabricated Technologies after Disaster on Time, Cost and Quality” , Iran: Islamic Azad University, Meybod Branch, Yazd.
  20. OCHA. 1995. “The Use of Military and Defense Assists in Relief Operation”. United Nations Office for The Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
  21. Salahi, A., Roshanai, A., and Roshanai, T. 2015. “Investigate the role of Temporary Accommodation in Reducing the Effects of Natural Disasters,” Journal of Structure, Architecture and Urban Development, 2:5-8.